Facebook argued that the post should be considered newsworthy, since it drew attention to suffering, and placed the post behind a warning screen. In the second case, the board upheld a decision by Facebook to restore a post depicting violence against a civilian in Sudan last year. As such, the Board is concerned that Meta is not consistently applying exemptions in the Hate Speech policy to expression from marginalized groups. The over-moderation of speech by users from persecuted minority groups is a serious threat to their freedom of expression. ![]() In its decision, the board noted why this is a problem:įor LGBTQIA+ people in countries which penalize their expression, social media is often one of the only means to express themselves freely. Instagram initially removed the post under its policies against hate speech. A (presumably LGBT) user had posted an image that included various anti-LGBTQ slurs in Arabic, they said, in an effort to reclaim the power of those words. In the first case, the board overturned a decision by the company to remove an Instagram post. On Monday, the Oversight Board - an independent body established by Facebook to make binding decisions about difficult questions of content moderation - issued two new rulings. AI-generated image by OpenAI’s DALL-E for the prompt “citizens voting in a beautiful democracy, digital art”Īmid increasingly dire predictions for American democracy, let’s look at one area where the voice of the people may be able to make some new inroads: tech platforms, which increasingly seem open to the idea of public participation on policy issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |